Group differences in test-taking behaviour: an example from a high-stakes testing program
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Assessing Assessment Literacy: Insights From a High-Stakes Test
This study constitutes an attempt to see what Language assessment literacy (LAL) isfor three groups of stakeholders, namely LAL test developers, LAL instructors, andLAL test-takers. The perceptions of the former group were derived from the contentanalysis of the latest version of the LAL test, and those of the latter 2 groups wereassessed through a survey designed by the researcher. Participant...
متن کاملBeneficial High–stakes Math Tests: an Example
A worked–out example is given to show how mathematical and educational insights can be incorporated in the structure of high–stakes K–12 math tests in a way that promotes more effective learning and better teaching practices. The example concerns symbolic skills deficits seen in students from calculator–oriented K–12 programs.
متن کاملassessing assessment literacy: insights from a high-stakes test
this study constitutes an attempt to see what language assessment literacy (lal) isfor three groups of stakeholders, namely lal test developers, lal instructors, andlal test-takers. the perceptions of the former group were derived from the contentanalysis of the latest version of the lal test, and those of the latter 2 groups wereassessed through a survey designed by the researcher. participant...
متن کاملHigh-Stakes Testing
I review the literature on the impact on student achievement of high-stakes testing. Its popularity as a mechanism for holding educators accountable has triggered studies to examine whether its promise to increase student learning has been fulfilled. The review concludes there is no consistent evidence to suggest high-stakes testing leads to increases in student learning. Some evidence suggests...
متن کاملInterpreting the Validity of a High-Stakes Test in Light of the Argument-Based Framework: Implications for Test Improvement
The validity of large-scale assessments may be compromised, partly due to their content inappropriateness or construct underrepresentation. Few validity studies have focused on such assessments within an argument-based framework. This study analyzed the domain description and evaluation inference of the Ph.D. Entrance Exam of ELT (PEEE) sat by Ph.D. examinees (n = 999) in 2014 in Iran....
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice
سال: 2016
ISSN: 0969-594X,1465-329X
DOI: 10.1080/0969594x.2016.1142935